@inbook {gold_beyond_2012,
	title = {Beyond Metrics: Community Authorization and Open Peer Review},
	booktitle = {Debates in the Digital Humanities},
	year = {2012},
	note = {00077},
	pages = {452{\textendash}459},
	publisher = {U of Minnesota Press},
	organization = {U of Minnesota Press},
	abstract = {In this article, Kathleen Fitzpatrick investigates the future of peer review as scholarship transitions from the age of print to the digital realm. Fitzpatrick argues that current peer review practices are designed to interact with print scholarship and are, therefore, in some cases, ill suited for providing feedback on digital publications. Fitzpatrick acknowledges that peer review as a concept cannot be forgotten, as it remains the gold standard for academic publications and can ease the academic{\textquoteright}s uncertainty over the {\textquotedblleft}promiscuity{\textquotedblright} of the online publishing world. Fitzpatrick goes on to discuss the benefits and challenges of revitalized models of peer review such as {\textquotedblleft}our-crowd{\textquotedblright} sourcing and the publish-then-filter model.},
	keywords = {Education / Educational Policy \& Reform / General, Education / Higher},
	isbn = {9780816677948},
	url = {http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates},
	author = {Fitzpatrick, Kathleen},
	editor = {Gold, Matthew K.}
}